Uber Giant Uber filed a lawsuit against Doordash on Friday, accusing the delivery outfit of choosing competition by intimidating restaurant owners in exclusive offers.

Uber claims in the lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of California, that its most important rival restaurants bullied to work with Doordash only. Uber claims that Doordash, which owns most of the US food deliverance market in the US, threatens restaurants with fines of a million dollars or the removal or dismantling of the business’s position on the Doordash app.

Uber claims that Doordash pressure is on restaurants to stop exclusive or almost exclusive agreements for first-party delivery services, which means Doordash insists on handling the orders placed by restaurants’ own websites, Uber says.

“Uber’s case has no merit,” a Doordash spokesman told TechCrunch in “NE -mail. “Their demands are unfounded and based on their inability to offer traders, consumers or couriers a quality alternative.”

Doordash and Uber Eats are best known for their respective programs to connect restaurant, consumers and action economics. Consumers use the programs to find and order foods such as pizza, egg rolls or pad Thai at restaurants. A worker of a gig economy then picks up the food to the consumer.

But the two companies also compete with their own white label delivery services, nominable Uber Direct and Doordash Drive on request-which were both launched in 2020. These services are cheaper for restaurants, allowing patrons directly from the restaurants’ own programs and the restaurants can order sites, while Uber and Doordash run the couriers behind the scenes.

In his suit, Uber claims that Doordash first-party deliveries handle for more than 90% of the largest enterprise restaurants in America, claiming that Doordash used competitive practices to win the market.

“More than 1 million traders are working with Uber Eats because we have helped them reach more customers and give them the freedom to decide how they want to grow their businesses with delivery,” said America, head of the Americas for Delivery at Uber, said in ‘Ne -mail statement. ‘We have increasingly heard complaints from restaurants that Doordash’s tactics limit the freedom and punish them for better options. We hope that this filing ends the unfair practices so that restaurants can choose what is best for them without being afraid of fine or retaliation. “

In one example from the lawsuit, Uber says that an unnamed ‘significant restaurant business’ told the company that it would not go forward with a long planned launch of Uber Direct on several of its restaurant brands. The reason, Uber claims, is because Doordash has allegedly threatened to increase the rates that the restaurant business charges to use Doordash’s third-party delivery services as he continues to use Uber Direct.

Uber says it was not a one -time event, but rather that multiple customers told the company that they felt they had a ‘gun on their head’, that doorash was a ‘monopolis’, and that they were by Dordash be bullied. “

Uber requested a jury hearing; The company did not specify the amount of damages in the complaint. However, Uber claims that these competitive practices cost the company “millions of dollars in revenue” and also limited the growth of Uber Direct.